Abstract
This study is aimed at describing of the impasse understanding of the polemic of the Nusantara Islamic discourse. The data were in the form of Indonesian language used in the polemic of the pros and cons of the Nusantara Islam issue, which is published on social media, Youtube. Data collection uses the method of listening with tapping, SBLC, download, and note techniques. The data analysis method used is Constant Comparative Analysis. The results of the analysis showed that there was a deadlock in understanding the issues of the Nusantara Islamic discourse regarding 4 things, namely symbolic identity, rejection in terms of terms, classic rivalry between tribes, and culture as the core problem. The deadlock of understanding was triggered by long competition between the two circles of Muhammadiyah and Nahdatul Ulama in viewing worship practices from different perspectives.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
