Abstract
본 연구는 KDC 디자인학 분야의 분류체계를 개선하고자, 선행연구에서 제시된 디자인학 연구분류체계들을 조사하고 KDC, DDC, LCC, NDC를 비교 분석하였다. KDC의 디자인학 분야 분류체계의 문제점으로는 디자인 이론영역과 관련된 분류항목 부족, 주요 디자인 응용분야에 대한 세목 미비, 디자인 범위를 명시하는 주기의 부재 등이 있다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위하여 본 연구에서는 디자인 이론영역, 시각디자인, 제품디자인, 환경디자인 분야에 해당되는 분류항목들에 대하여 구체적인 개선방안을 제시하였다. For the purpose of improving the Korean Decimal Classification (KDC) in the design field, this study investigated the classification systems of design research suggested in previous studies and compared KDC, DDC, LCC, and NDC. The problems identified from the current KDC include lack of subdivisions regarding basic design theories and major design application fields and the absence of notes for explaining the scope of each design field. To solve these problems, this study suggested improvements for design theories, graphic design, industrial design, and environmental design.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
