Abstract

This paper examines Kaldor's methodological critique of orthodox economic theory in the light of recent developments in the philosophy of science. Lawson has provided the most philosophically sophisticated interpretation of Kaldor's method ological work available to date from a critical realist perspective. We argue in this paper that critical realism, while clearly superior to existing orthodox approaches, is philosophically too restrictive and an alternative framework, causal holism, is developed. Causal holism, based on a synthesis of Quine's holism and van Fraassen's constructive empiricism, provides a methodological reconstruction of Kaldor that is ultimately more compatible with his 'non-monist' critique of orthodox equilibrium economics.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.