Abstract

This letter presents a distributive environmental justice analysis of unconventional gas development in the area of Pennsylvania lying over the Marcellus Shale, the largest shale gas formation in play in the United States. The extraction of shale gas using unconventional wells, which are hydraulically fractured (fracking), has increased dramatically since 2005. As the number of wells has grown, so have concerns about the potential public health effects on nearby communities. These concerns make shale gas development an environmental justice issue. This letter examines whether the hazards associated with proximity to wells and the economic benefits of shale gas production are fairly distributed. We distinguish two types of distributive environmental justice: traditional and benefit sharing. We ask the traditional question: are there a disproportionate number of minority or low-income residents in areas near to unconventional wells in Pennsylvania? However, we extend this analysis in two ways: we examine income distribution and level of education; and we compare before and after shale gas development. This contributes to discussions of benefit sharing by showing how the income distribution of the population has changed. We use a binary dasymetric technique to remap the data from the 2000 US Census and the 2009–2013 American Communities Survey and combine that data with a buffer containment analysis of unconventional wells to compare the characteristics of the population living nearer to unconventional wells with those further away before and after shale gas development. Our analysis indicates that there is no evidence of traditional distributive environmental injustice: there is not a disproportionate number of minority or low-income residents in areas near to unconventional wells. However, our analysis is consistent with the claim that there is benefit sharing distributive environmental injustice: the income distribution of the population nearer to shale gas wells has not been transformed since shale gas development.

Highlights

  • The production of shale gas in the United States (US) has grown rapidly from 0.2 trillion cubic feet in 1998 to 11.4 trillion cubic feet in 2013 (Sovacool 2014, US Environmental Information Agency (EIA) 2015)

  • In the 2009–2013 data, we found that the percentage of those living below the poverty threshold was slightly lower in areas close to unconventional wells than in areas further away

  • This letter is the first analysis of unconventional gas developments in Pennsylvania to examine both traditional and benefit sharing distributive environmental justice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The production of shale gas in the United States (US) has grown rapidly from 0.2 trillion cubic feet in 1998 to 11.4 trillion cubic feet in 2013 (Sovacool 2014, US Environmental Information Agency (EIA) 2015). The rapid increase in shale gas production in the US has been hailed as enhancing energy security, reducing natural gas prices and providing economic development (Hanlon 2011, de Melo-Martin et al 2014, Willow 2015). It has been the subject of fierce political disputes in some areas with opponents securing moratoria on unconventional well development in three US states, Maryland, New York and Vermont (Wilber 2012, Food and Water Watch 2015)

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call