Abstract
In a work that invited considerable comment, Theodore J. Lowi proposed "juridical democracy" as an alternative to interest-group liberalism. While conceding that juridical democracy might enliven democratic values now obscured by interest-group liberialism, Professor Grady suggests that Professor Lowi's argument is essentially a polemic that does not accomplish much beyond reaffirming the notion of constitutionalism. Moreover, it has little prospect of implementation, for it threatens to destabilize established interests and public actors.
Full Text
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call