Abstract
Professors LoPucki and Mooney have responded to my article, The Inherent Irrationality of Judgment Proofing,' and I have been granted the opportuLity to write a short rejoinder. Given page limitations and the fact that Professor Mooney and I are in agreement on the fundamentals, I discuss only Professor LoPucki's response.2 Both that response and my rejoinder follow my analytical approach of dividing judgment proof structures into two categories: arm's length and non-arm's length.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
