Abstract

The co-existence of Enlightenment and ideology has long vexed Jews in modernity. They have both loved and been leary of Enlightenment reason and its attending scientific and political institutions. Jews have also held a complex relationship to ideological forms that exist alongside Enlightenment reason and which have both lured and victimized them alike. Still, what accounts for this historical proximity between Enlightenment and ideology? and how does this relationship factor into the emergence of modern anti-Semitism? Can Jewish communities participate in contemporary societies committed to scientific developments and deliberative democracies and neither be targeted by totalizing systems of thought that eliminate Judaism’s difference nor fall prey to the power and seduction of ideological forces that compete with the Jewish life-world? This article argues that Hegel’s discussion of the Enlightenment in the Phenomenology of Spirit as a social practice of critical common sensism provides an immanent critique of Max Horkheimer’s and Theodore Adorno’s analysis of the absolutism of the Enlightenment that can bolster Jewish communal and philosophical hope in the commensurability between Judaism and the contemporary expressions of Enlightenment reason, even if it does not fully eradicate the challenges presented by ideology for Jewish communities and thinkers.

Highlights

  • Enlightenment reason and which have both lured and victimized them alike

  • Hegel’s discussion of the Enlightenment in the Phenomenology of Spirit as a social practice of critical common sensism provides an immanent critique of Max Horkheimer’s and Theodore Adorno’s analysis of the absolutism of the Enlightenment that can bolster Jewish communal and philosophical hope in the commensurability between Judaism and the contemporary expressions of Enlightenment reason, even if it does not fully eradicate the challenges presented by ideology for Jewish communities and thinkers

  • What is the relationship between these two forces? How and why can Enlightenment co-exist with ideology insofar as ideology distorts or blunts reasoning processes at work in key scientific, academic, and political institutions?

Read more

Summary

Enlightenment and Ideology

It is often said that there are two Americas. Most recently, this applies to the paradox of an America that rests and relies on Enlightenment institutions, e.g., science, the academy, and the system of checks and balances, and an America that appears trapped by ideological narratives that thwart democratic processes and sustain cultural polemics. Hegel’s discussion of the Enlightenment in the Phenomenology of Spirit as a social practice of critical common sensism can be enlisted as an immanent critique of Horkheimer and Adorno’s analysis of the absolutism of the Enlightenment that can bolster Jewish communal and philosophical hope in the commensurability between Judaism and the contemporary expressions of Enlightenment reason This is not to say, that Hegel’s immanent critique eradicates the challenges presented by ideology for Jewish communities and thinkers. This is because, communal justificatory praxis, the primary outcome of Hegel’s immanent critique of Horkheimer and Adorno’s dialectic of Enlightenment is a fragile activity, in times of life-world crises It is precisely in the moments when rational reflection is most in demand that it is most burdensome to those who need it and most likely to be challenged by forces of ideology that threaten to replace it as the mechanism for social coordination and institutional legitimization. As I will argue, this is the situation affecting many Jewish communities today, Jewish thinkers are called to identify and acknowledge the unique character of the antagonism between the exercise of a Jewish communal justificatory practice that is needed for Jewish communities to remain active participants in the contemporary Enlightenment institutions of science, democracy, and the academy and the ideological forces that threaten to replace this communal practice of reflection

Dialectic of the Enlightenment
Immanent Critique of the Dialectic of Enlightenment
Ideology’s Challenge to Communal Justificatory Reflection
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.