Abstract
This article analyzes Jurgen Habermas’ interpretation and criticism of Carl Schmitt’s juridical-political thinking. It will be done through the critical analysis of three dimensions: The concept of politics, Theory of the Constitution and Political Theology. This study concludes that Habermas is not only a critic of Schmitt but also one of his most essential interpreters in Europe.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
