Abstract
This paper approaches the reception of the late-medieval account of logical consequence in John Mair (†1550). The paper briefly compares Mair’s account of formal consequence with Buridan’s, and it aims to revisit the characterization of a Parisian and a British tradition concerning the division of formal and material consequence. Although Mair clearly incorporates Buridan’s account, I aim to show that Mair’s Liber Consequentiarum points towards original developments within that tradition.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
