Abstract
This study investigated the joint angles of isocomfort (JAIs) for females based on the psychophysical scalings for static standing postures held for 60 s, which were obtained in a laboratory experiment. The subjects were instructed to rate their comfort levels for varyious joint postures by using the free modulus method of magnitude estimation. The comfort scores for the joint postures and the related verbal comfort categories were subjected to regression analysis in order to obtain the JAIs corresponding to verbal categories. The results showed that the JAIs were significantly different depending upon the joints and joint postures investigated (p < 0.01), and that the JAIs for female subjects were significantly different than those for males (p < 0.01) which had been obtained in an earlier study (Kee and Karwowski, 2001). Compared to the corresponding range of joint motion values, the JAIs for hip postures were the smallest of all joint postures dealt with in this study, while those for the neck were the largest of all postures, which means that hip postures are more stressful than any other joint posture. Based on this study, it is recommended that the gender-based JAI values should be used for design applications.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have