Abstract

The name of John Dee (1527–1608) is one which every navigator, whether seaman or airman, has good cause to respect. For he was the first to try to teach unscholarly English sailors the use of the spherical triangle to find the distance and direction of some desired haven on the globe. Nor was that his only contribution to nautical science. Yet historians have treated him slightingly, dubbing him astrologer and alchemist, by which words they understand ‘charlatan’. Consequently the popular picture of him is of a servile, ignoble figure, eager to dupe the first Elizabeth and her courtiers. The acclaimed mathematician, and the ever-ready instructor are forgotten. It is true, of course, that Dee cast horoscopes, and that he hoped to find the formula for transmuting the baser metals into gold. It is true, besides, that in middle age he took to crystal-gazing, believing that he conversed with angelic spirits. Hence when in 1583 he went abroad at the invitation of the Polish Prince Lasky, a mob broke into his house at Mortlake and wrecked his library, which contained over 4000 books and manuscripts, besides scientific instruments. But by this date his work on navigation had come to an end. Yet his simple account of his meeting with the medium Edward Kelly (who was indeed a cheat) reveals him as a sincere man. Kelly at once asked to see what feats he could perform, but, says Dee, ‘I truly excused myself therein, as not in ye vulgarly accounted magic either studied or exercised. But… I brought forth to him my stone in ye frame … and said to. him that I was credibly informed that to it, after a sort, were answerable aliqui boni Angeli—certain good Angels.’ We should perhaps echo, therefore, the judgment of Disraeli—Dee's imagination often predominated over his science—but science he had.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call