Abstract
Instead of assuming that Old Testament theophanies depict the Father (as is the case with so many modern Christian readings), most ancient Christians assumed the “Lord” appearing in the scriptures is the preincarnate Son. This approach to reading the scriptures, known as YHWH Christology, is outright rejected by Marcion, explicitly championed by Justin Martyr, and heavily nuanced by Augustine of Hippo. In reviewing their respective approaches, YHWH Christology comes into clearer view, along with its potential problems. This approach is then tested with cases from the New Testament to see the precedent for YHWH Christology provided by at least some of the biblical authors, followed by a few thoughts on the implications of retrieving this hermeneutic.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
