Abstract
The terms “internal justification” and “external justification” are often used to analyse the justification of legal decisions. The aim of this research paper is to identify and critically analyse different notions of “internal justification” and “external justification” in order to improve them. The author rejects the notion of “internal justification” and “external justification” offered by Jerzy Wróblewski and the thesis that the role of internal justification is to test the validity of arguments. The author demonstrates that the notions of “internal justification” and “external justification” used by Robert Alexy are mutually contradictory and offers ways to avoid this contradiction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
