Abstract
In describing the very mammal-like dentitions of some of the advanced Theriodont reptiles various authors have identified premolars and molars (Broom , 1913). Though there is some evidence for this differentiation in the form of the teeth of some of the gomphodont cynodonts, there is no satisfactory evidence that only two dentitions were present or that the replacement was of a mammalian type. On the other hand Sushkin (1927) described the type of the primitive cynodont Permocynodon sushkini , Smith Woodward , as having several molariform teeth “ changing ” and says “ it may be established thus that the teeth are changing irregularly as usually in the reptiles and that there is no difference in this respect between the anterior and hindermost teeth ; thus despite the difference of the form, no premolars and molars can be distinguished” . Unfortunately he does not say which teeth are changing. Other authors, uncertain of the manner of replacement, have avoided implying a mammalian succession by the use of such terms as “ cheek ” teeth or “ post-canine” teeth.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.