Abstract
Objective This study aimed to validate the Cultural Humility and Enactment Scale - Supervision (CHES-S). Method The sample included a total of 201 post-masters counselors who were currently engaged in clinical supervision across 11 U.S. states, who were recruited from the state licensing board email lists. Analyses included confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) analysis based on a multidimensional adaptation of the partial credit model. Results We found evidence to support the three-factor structure of the CHES-S. We also found that the CHES-S can be used to distinguish participants scores from low to high CH, and that the thresholds of each item could capture participants responses in the expected order. Conclusion Evidencing reliability and validity with a sample of post-master’s practitioners engaged in supervision for licensure, the CHES-S can be effectively utilized as a tool to monitor supervisory process and outcome in clinical supervision.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call