Abstract
In this article I present a dyadic process model to explain the emergence of abusive supervision as an escalating process of supervisor-subordinate interaction. Based on a social exchange framework, the model draws on organizational justice and previous abusive supervision research as well as insights from behavioral ethics literature. I argue that the emergence of abusive supervision originates from initial subordinate perceptions of supervisor injustice. When reconciliation does not occur, subordinate perceptions of supervisor injustice and supervisor perceptions of inadequate subordinate (response) behavior may accumulate and thereby increasingly reinforce each other in an escalating spiral. Perceptions of power asymmetry are proposed to systematically inhibit reconciliation attempts (e.g., remedial voice). Eventually, the tipping point of intentional supervisor hostility is reached and crossed. I offer research propositions along the discussion of the model.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have