Abstract
The choices of methodology for analysis of non-viable fungal surface samples are yet to be agreed upon. The two main types of analysis of non-viable fungal (gross fungi) samples can be generally categorised as counting based (enumeration of fungal structures) or categorization based (such as percent coverage estimates or fungal rating categories). We present evidence of flaws in the percent coverage methodology due to a strong dependence on individual analyst’s subjective estimates. By using image analysis and a survey of analysts we show the high variability between analysts’ percent coverage estimates. We also propose an enumeration-based methodology which attempts to address problems in current counting-based methods by using a semi-random grid pattern of fields of view rather than a traverses-based approach.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Bacteriology & Mycology: Open Access
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
