Abstract
'Health gaps between countries and among social groups within countries have widened'. Health is a basic need of a human being and access to health is a basic human right. Article 47 of the Indian Constitution enjoins the State to improve the standard of Public Health, as it is one of its primary duties. India, forms 17% of the global population and accounts for 20% of the total global disease burden. There are pronounced disparities existing between the rural and urban areas, as indicated by the infant mortality rates. Eighty-two percent are residing in villages. Seventy-four percent of the doctors live in urban areas, serving only 28% of the population. The people in rural areas are still unable to access the services of doctors. In this scenario the Ministry of Health (MOH) Government of India (GOI) announced the start of a new course, to create a cadre of rural doctors. The article will look at the shortfalls in the rural health of India as well as region- and statewise disparities in health status, health infrastructure, and manpower availability and the study was conducted by a literature review of government reports and published articles. There exist gross disparities between rural and urban areas due to negligence of the rulers. Even after initiation of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) greater than two-thirds of the funds flow to the urban areas/secondary care. The population based on the 2001 census, shows a shortfall in the rural health infrastructure; Community Health Centers (CHC) - 68%, Primary Health Centers (PHC) - 31%, and Subcenters - (SC) - 29%. The solution by creating a new cadre of doctors without improving facilities in the rural areas or without an equitable distribution of resources is unethical. The scarcity of health manpower in rural areas of India was due to skewed prioritization and distribution of resources. This can be corrected by reversing the urban centric planning and bringing equity in social development.
Highlights
The scarcity of health manpower in rural areas of India was due to skewed prioritization and distribution of resources. This can be corrected by reversing the urban centric planning and bringing equity in social development
As recommended by the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) task force for medical education[1] and proposed by the study group headed by GP Dutta, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, (MOH and FW) and the Medical Council of India (MCI) has decided to start an ‘updated alternate model of the medical education course, for creating a new cadre of doctors catering to the rural areas
The attempt is to segregate medical services at three levels ― the first is the level of primary healthcare services that can be delivered with an optimal level of competence by the short-course health practitioner, exclusively for rural areas, the second category is of the balance of the medical conditions, where only the graduate MBBS doctor will be licensed to deliver services; and the third is the domain of the specialist with postgraduate qualifications; which is for urban areas, is injustice
Summary
As recommended by the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) task force for medical education[1] and proposed by the study group headed by GP Dutta, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, (MOH and FW) and the Medical Council of India (MCI) has decided to start an ‘updated alternate model of the medical education course, for creating a new cadre of doctors catering to the rural areas. The attempt is to segregate medical services at three levels ― the first is the level of primary healthcare services that can be delivered with an optimal level of competence by the short-course health practitioner, exclusively for rural areas, the second category is of the balance of the medical conditions, where only the graduate MBBS doctor will be licensed to deliver services; and the third is the domain of the specialist with postgraduate qualifications; which is for urban areas, is injustice. The training of these rural healthcare practitioners will be a major area of concern. Who will monitor the quality of work of the BRHC graduates? it becomes government sponsored quackery
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Medicine and Public Health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.