Abstract
• Stable isotopes were measured to determine vapor sources of inland precipitation. • Local meteoric water lines (MWLs) had a smaller slope and intercept than global MWL. • Isotopic fractionations were induced by strong evapotranspiration. • Hydro-chemical ions were originated mainly from the continent rather than oceans. • Precipitation-forming water vapor came from multiple sources. An inland river grassland basin is a fragile ecosystem, and precipitation is of great significance to its resilience. However, the knowledge of where precipitation-forming water vapor originated is not well understood, limiting the predictability of future precipitation provided climate change. The objective of this study was to characterize the hydrogen (δD) and oxygen (δ 18 O) isotopes and hydro-chemical compositions of precipitation as well as decipher atmospheric water vapor sources in a typical Eurasian steppe river basin. In this regard, this study collected 59 water samples from 44 storm events in 2019 and 2020. The samples were analyzed in our laboratory for ions, δD, and δ 18 O, which in turn were used to examine the stable isotopic features, hydro-chemical characteristics, and water vapor transport at different temporal scales by a backward trajectory model and correlation and redundancy analyses. The results showed negative δD and δ 18 O during the wet season with a trend of positive deuterium excess, indicating that precipitation effect was significant. In comparison with a linear model of global meteoric water levels, the local meteoric water lines had smaller slopes and intercepts, with a maximum slope in August and a minimum slope in July. In addition, HCO 3 – and Ca 2+ were the primary hydro-chemical ions in precipitation. Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ were significantly correlated with HCO 3 – and Na + , indicating that they shared terrestrial and marine sources. NH 4 + originated mainly from human activities and chemical reactions, whereas K + originated primarily from continental and marine processes. Further, the atmospheric water vapor was mainly transported from the northeast, northwest, and southeast directions into the study basin, as affected by the westerly wind circulation, the East Asian summer monsoon, northeast anticyclone circulation, and local evapotranspiration. Moreover, the water vapor was from both onsite and offsite sources: over 40% from Eurasia, 10 to 25% from the Arctic Ocean, and 35 to 45% from the Pacific Ocean.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call