Isogeometric-based mapping modeling and buckling analysis of stiffened panels

Abstract

Modeling and analysis of stiffened panels are two key technologies in the design of aerospace thin-walled structures. For the stiffened panels with complex geometry, classical finite element analysis (FEA) and conventional isogeometric analysis (IGA) based on explicit geometry usually require time-consuming and labor-intensive geometric processing, and additional coupling matrices to be ready for analysis. In this study, a new method for modeling and buckling analysis of stiffened panels is proposed, which provides a more efficient and simpler way. During the modeling process, the stiffeners are treated as curves on surfaces, which is not explicitly defined using the control-point-based representation of curves, but implicitly defined using parameter curves in the parametric space of the surface. Mapping modeling provides more accurate geometric description and transfer the complex modeling problems (three-dimensional space) of stiffeners on free-form surface into simple modeling problems in the regular parametric space (two-dimensional space). During the buckling analysis process, a new mapped stiffener element based on mapping modeling is proposed, which can model the section of the eccentric stiffener without changing the geometry. The precise normal information of the Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS) surface can ensure that the stiffeners are perpendicular to the skin. In addition, the coupling of the stiffener and the skin is automatic, without any additional coupling matrix. This buckling analysis framework realizes the complete integration of modeling and analysis. Furthermore, for the stiffened panels with cutouts, the trimmed surface analysis (TSA) method is extended to be used for the numerical integration of the trimmed stiffeners, which means that no additional geometric process is required. Finally, four numerical examples of different types of stiffened panels are constructed, involving metal, trimmed surface, classical grid-stiffener, free-form surface, variable-stiffness composites, and curvilinear grid-stiffener. Several numerical examples of static and buckling analysis of stiffened panels with high fidelity demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework.