Abstract
This paper examines the way in which ISIS established the caliphate, justifying doing so by way of a kind of syllogism. “Were the caliphate to exist,” ISIS argued, “it would possess certain characteristics (the major premise). We possess those characteristics (minor premise). Ergo, we are that caliphate and it would be a sin not to announce ourselves as such.” At the same time, ISIS averred that setting up the caliphate constituted a clear sign of the end times. But this very physical caliphate constituted both ISIS’s appeal and its greatest vulnerability. What would happen if coalition forces successfully crippled the “minor premise” and delayed ISIS’s expected end time? This paper explores what did happen and specifically how coalition battlefield victories compelled ISIS to alter its appeals and its very narrative structure. It closes with a brief comment on what may come next.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
