Is there more than one way to unpack a Weibel-Palade body?

Abstract

To the editor: Endothelial cells respond to vascular damage by secreting concatemers of the adhesive glycoprotein von Willebrand factor (VWF) to capture blood platelets and promote hemostasis. VWF is contained in large rod-shaped secretory granules called Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs), and how VWF is stored in and released from these organelles is of considerable interest.1 Recently, a novel mechanism was described for VWF release in which an actomyosin ring forms around the WPB several seconds after its fusion with the plasma membrane to squeeze VWF from the WPB.2 This new mechanism was described in experiments using the potent secretagogue phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), and has received considerable attention.3-5 However, the mechanism of action of PMA differs in several key respects from that of physiological secretagogues, such as histamine, that elevate intracellular free calcium ion concentrations ([Ca2+]i). PMA action is characterized by a slow onset (tens of seconds to minutes) but a protracted (hours) period of WPB fusion that occurs without an increase in [Ca2+]i. VWF is released slowly from the WPB after fusion with the plasma membrane (tens of seconds), and secretion is prevented by inhibition of protein kinase C,6 myosin IIB (MyoIIB),2 or actin disruption or stabilization.7 In contrast, histamine (or ionomycin) triggers a rapid (<1 second) but transient (10-30 seconds) burst in WPB exocytosis.8 Ca2+-mediated VWF secretion is not blocked by protein kinase C inhibition6 or actin disruption,9 and early optical studies indicated that the initial expulsion of VWF occurs on a subsecond time scale (see Erent et al8 and references therein). On the basis of these observations we asked whether the actomyosin process represents a general mechanism for VWF release from WPBs. Our new data suggest not. First, live-cell imaging of fluorescent VWF–enhanced green fluorescent protein (VWF-EGFP) or VWF-propeptide-EGFP (VWFpp-EGFP) expulsion from individual WPBs shows this process to be fast (Figure 1Ai-ii). Second, dual-color imaging of endothelial cells coexpressing VWFpp-EGFP or VWFpp-mCherry and either TagRFP-actin (Figure 1Bi-ii) or MyoIIB-GFP (Figure 1Ci-ii) revealed no evidence of redistribution or accumulation of actin or MyoIIB to WPBs undergoing exocytosis. Third, MyoIIB inhibition by blebbistatin did not prevent histamine-evoked VWF secretion (Figure 1D), and we have reconfirmed that actin disruption or stabilization fails to prevent Ca2+-mediated VWF secretion. Because myosin II may subtly regulate the opening of secretory granule fusion pores (reviewed in Porat-Shliom et al3), we also performed amperometry studies but found no major effects of MyoIIB inhibition on WPB fusion pore formation or expansion (Figure 1E). Together, the data suggest that expulsion of VWF from WPBs during Ca2+-driven WPB exocytosis does not involve actomyosin. Figure 1 Fast actomyosin-independent VWF expulsion from WPBs during Ca2+-mediated exocytosis. In the absence of flow, secreted VWF concatemers form irregular-shaped patches on the cell surface and disperse slowly into solution. Importantly, the initial expulsion ... What other mechanism might account for fast actomyosin-independent VWF expulsion during Ca2+-mediated exocytosis? Studies of mucins, large multimeric glycoproteins closely related to VWF, suggest that the subsecond expulsion of these charged polymers from mucin granules is driven by ionic fluxes and water entry (discussed in Erent et al8). VWF, like mucins, is stored at high concentration, and the condensation and aggregation of these proteins are facilitated by charge shielding by cationic species including hydrogen ion (H+) and Ca2+. The acidic lumen of the WPB is particularly important for VWF expulsion. Loss of H+ following fusion pore formation precedes postfusion changes in WPB morphology and rapid VWF expulsion, and both processes can be blocked simply by lowering the external pH close to that of the prefusion mature WPB.10 Thus, VWF expulsion from WPBs during histamine- or Ca2+-mediated exocytosis utilizes a beautifully simple mechanism that depends, in essence, on the chemistry of VWF and the intracellular processes that ensure its condensation and aggregation for storage at high concentration. Is this mechanism likely to be of physiological relevance? Following injury, endothelial cells must function rapidly to minimize blood loss. The earliest event within these endothelial cells will be an increase in [Ca2+]i produced either by cell damage, physicomechanical stimulation, or acute activation by physiological mediators generated locally at the injury site (eg, thrombin, histamine, fibrin, adenine nucleotides, and peptidoleukotrienes). Together, these mediators ensure rapid VWF expulsion to the endothelial cell surface to capture platelets and facilitate hemostasis. Clearly, there is more than one way to unpack a WPB. Further studies will be needed to clarify the specific physiological conditions subserved by actomyosin-dependent and -independent VWF delivery to the endothelial cell surface.