Is there a difference in quality of photographs obtained using smartphones, compared to the photographs obtained via digital single-lens reflex camera?

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the quality of photographs obtained with three different cameras: I-phone, Samsung, and DSLR, as assessed by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (OMSs). MethodsThis was an anonymous online survey study. The study population consisted of OMSs in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts who were members of their state societies. Primary outcome variable was ratings on the quality of extraoral and intraoral photographs obtained with three different cameras. Predictor variable was type of camera used to obtain the photographs: I-Phone, Samsung, and DSLR camera. Descriptive statistics were computed. Spearman test was utilized to analyze correlation between the outcome variables. ResultsMajority of respondents were from full time private practice (n = 84, 77.06%), followed by full time academia (n = 12, 11.01%). Spearman test revealed negligible correlation between extraoral and intraoral photographs on the best quality rating (0.15, p=0.13). Negligible correlation between extraoral and intraoral photographs were noted on the second best (0.15, p=0.11), and least quality rating (0.09, p=0.32). ConclusionStudy results revealed that there is no difference between the quality of photographs obtained using smartphones, compared to the photographs obtained via DSLR camera. Future discussions on an ideal application on smartphones would allow for consent and transfer of high-quality photographs via a secure messaging system between healthcare providers to address ethical concerns of confidentiality.