Abstract

ObjectiveThe spot sign is a validated imaging marker widely used in CT angiography (CTA) to detect active bleeding and a higher risk of hematoma expansion in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The aim of this study was to investigate the detectability of spot signs on thin multiplanar projection reconstruction (MPR) images compared to thicker maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, we assessed imaging data of 146 patients with primary hypertensive/microangiopathic ICH who received emergency non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and CTA. Two experienced radiologists, blinded to each other, evaluated images of thin (1 mm) MPR images and thick (3 mm) MIP images on the presence of spot signs and performed a consensus reading. Kappa tests were used for data comparison. ResultsIn total, spot signs were observed in 27 cases (=18.5 %) in both thin MPR and thick MIP slices. Detectability of the spot sign did not differ in 1 mm MPR images and 3 mm MIP images (Cohen’s kappa, 1.0; p = 0.00). Also, when the readings of the two radiologists were analyzed separately, results for MPR and MIP slices were similar (MPR: Cohen’s kappa, 0.81, p = 0.00; MIP: Cohen’s kappa, 0.74; p = 0.00). ConclusionNo significant difference in the detectability of the spot sign could be demonstrated when comparing 1 mm MPR images with 3 mm MIP images.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.