Is sternotomy superior to thoracotomy for modified Blalock-Taussig shunt?

Abstract

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: is sternotomy approach superior to a thoracotomy approach for a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt procedure? More than 58 papers were found using the search as described below, of which 11 papers represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Three of seven papers compared the sternotomy and thoracotomy approaches. The operative approach was a significant predictor of shunt failure. The criterion used to define early shunt failure was either the complete occlusion during hospitalization or the need to return to the operating room for a second shunt. The studies that compared the thoracotomy and sternotomy approaches observed increased shunt failure rates in the thoracotomy group. The sternotomy approach was associated with advantages like less pulmonary artery distortion, ease of technical performance, cosmetic advantage of a single sternotomy incision, ease of ligation of patent ductus, less phrenic nerve injury, less collateral formation in chest wall adhesions and less thoracotomy induced scoliosis. However, other papers studied either the sternotomy approach only or the thoracotomy approach and drew conclusions regarding risk factors for operative morbidity and mortality. We conclude that the sternotomy approach is beneficial to neonates and infants undergoing modified Blalock-Taussig shunt when compared with the conventional thoracotomy approach.