Abstract

Species richness and range size are key features of biogeographic and macroecological analyses, which can yield a first assessment tool to define conservation priorities. Here we combined both features in a simultaneous analysis, based on range-diversity plots, to identify sets of rich-rare (high species richness with restricted ranges) and poor-rare cells (low species richness with restricted ranges). We applied this analysis to the anurans of South America and evaluated the representation of those sets of cells within the protected area system. South American anurans showed high species richness in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest and East Tropical Andes, while regions harboring most of the rare species were concentrated in the Andes and Atlantic Coast from North-Eastern Brazil to River Plate. Based on such patterns, we identified as rich-rare cells the Brazilian Atlantic Forest and Tropical Andes and as poor-rare cells the southern part of Andes and Uruguay. A low fraction of both sets of cells was represented within the protected area system. We show that a simultaneous consideration of species richness and rarity provides a rapid assessment of large-scale biodiversity patterns and may contribute to the definition of conservation priorities.

Highlights

  • The ongoing biodiversity crisis claims for conservation actions that help mitigate it [1]

  • This geographic assessment of biodiversity features represents the first step towards informed conservation actions [4,8]

  • We mapped the geographic distribution of South American anurans drawn from the Global Amphibian Assessment [22] onto a 1u61u resolution grid

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ongoing biodiversity crisis claims for conservation actions that help mitigate it [1]. The definition of spatial priorities must be based on an assessment of the geographic distribution of biodiversity features of conservation interest (e.g., numbers of species, phylogenetic and functional distinctiveness or genetic diversity) [4,5,6,7]. This geographic assessment of biodiversity features represents the first step towards informed conservation actions [4,8]. Additional information (e.g., species’ abundances, functional traits, phylogenetic relationships, ecosystem services, and region-specific sociopolitical issues) is still required for conducting detailed conservation actions [6]. Broadscale conservation assessments constitute only an initial stage of planning from which more detailed assessments and prioritizations (e.g., at smaller spatial scales) can be conducted [4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call