Abstract
The topic of "IS research relevance" is receiving increasing attention from the IS research community. In this article, based on a panel discussion at the 2001 International Conference on Information Systems, three arguments are explored in connection with IS research relevance. The first argument, called "subtle accomplishment", suggests that IS research is relevant, but in a subtle way. The second argument, called "unfulfilled promise", maintains that the promise of conducting relevant research is still unfulfilled. The third argument, called "serial hypocrisy", argues that, while "relevance to practice" is frequently proclaimed as a virtue in public, in reality practical relevance does not matter in IS research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Communications of the Association for Information Systems
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
