Abstract
The concept of health permeates priorities and policies for managing wild Pacific salmon ( Oncorynchus spp.). Regulatory agencies rely largely on salmon abundance and (or) the absence of pathogens to declare if a population is healthy. Our goal was to determine if there was a receptive policy environment within Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to adopt a cumulative effects perspective of health. We used a previously developed health model along with a multiple streams framework and a narrative review of DFO policy to see how fish health was situated in DFO’s salmon management problems, policy, and politics. We discovered that a cumulative effects perspective was consistent with policy goals and priorities. DFO’s guiding principles and responsibilities for aquatic animal health were spread across multiple policies and regulations. There were no processes or people responsible for integrating information and activities. The use of the word health in policies and planning without a consistent definition meant that DFO could not explicitly assess if it has reached its management target of healthy salmon. An option for transitioning to cumulative effects perspective is to adopt a healthy public policy perspective and processes to integrate the diverse information linked to social and environmental determinants of health.
Highlights
Received: March 18, 2019Accepted: October 1, 2019Published: December 9, 2019Published by: Canadian Science PublishingFederal responsibility for wild Pacific salmon (Oncorhyncus spp.) in Canada is delegated to Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO)
DFO largely relies on salmon abundance and the absence of pathogens to declare if a population is healthy
We found 34 policies and regulations based on these Acts related to salmon
Summary
Federal responsibility for wild Pacific salmon (Oncorhyncus spp.) in Canada is delegated to Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). DFO is committed to maintaining “healthy and diverse populations of salmon that will support sustainable fisheries and meet the needs of future generations” (Fisheries and Oceans Canada 2017). DFO largely relies on salmon abundance and (or) the absence of pathogens to declare if a population is healthy. The absence of disease approach provides no non-zero standard to define the frequency or amount of disease that is acceptable in healthy fish (Stephen et al 2011). Abundance-based stock assessment does not address the nuances of what is happening during the life course of salmon (Dorner et al 2013). Neither health standard defines health from a cumulative effects perspective
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have