Abstract

As sensor measurements emerge in urban water systems, data-driven unsupervised machine learning algorithms have drawn tremendous interest in event detection and hydraulic water level and flow prediction recently. However, most of them are applied in water distribution systems and few studies consider using unsupervised cluster analysis to group the time-series hydraulic-hydrologic data in stormwater urban drainage systems. To improve the understanding of how cluster analysis contributes to flooding location detection, this study compared the performance of K-means clustering, agglomerative clustering, and spectral clustering in uncovering time-series water depth dissimilarity. In this work, the water depth datasets are simulated by an urban drainage model and then formatted for a clustering problem. Three standard performance evaluation metrics, namely the silhouette coefficient index, Calinski–Harabasz index, and Davies–Bouldin index are employed to assess the clustering performance in flooding detection under various storms. The results show that silhouette coefficient index and Davies–Bouldin index are more suitable for assessing the performance of K-means and agglomerative clustering, while the Calinski–Harabasz index only works for spectral clustering, indicating these clustering algorithms are metric-dependent flooding indicators. The results also reveal that the agglomerative clustering performs better in detecting short-duration events while K-means and spectral clustering behave better in detecting long-duration floods. The findings of these investigations can be employed in urban stormwater flood detection at the specific junction-level sites by using the occurrence of anomalous changes in water level of correlated clusters as flood early warning for the local neighborhoods.

Highlights

  • Urban drainage systems (UDSs) are the infrastructures constructed to provide conveyance ability and storage capability for drainage overflow mitigation, surface inundation reduction, and pollutant removal

  • In the age of ‘smart stormwater,’ the increased deployment of sensors to monitor water level characteristics is resulting in rapidly accumulating data

  • It is becoming crucial to understand and promote methods to handle these big datasets to help in flood detection and control

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban drainage systems (UDSs) are the infrastructures constructed to provide conveyance ability and storage capability for drainage overflow mitigation, surface inundation reduction, and pollutant removal. The existing UDSs, whose functionality can only serve for a limited number of years, might degrade and even deteriorate as time goes by [1]. The deployed sensors can measure the water quantity and quality data in a real-time way, which makes it feasible for decision-makers and stakeholders to foresee the potential flood events and locate the vulnerable sites, which supports. The need to understand the emerging data is crucial for forecasting flash floods, reducing sewer overflows, and detecting flooded sites [4,5,6]. Interpreting big water data for flood detection is attracting increasing attention from researchers [7,8,9,10] and can be employed to reduce potential flood damages

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call