Abstract

<strong>PICO question</strong><br /><p>In dogs undergoing surgery for repair of a prolapsed gland of the third eyelid (cherry eye), is a pocket technique superior to an anchoring technique in preventing recurrence?</p><strong>Clinical bottom line</strong><br /><p>For surgical treatment of a prolapsed gland of the third eyelid (cherry eye), there is currently no evidence to suggest that either an anchoring technique or a pocket technique is significantly better than the other when comparing recurrence rates. In practice, and until randomised controlled trials are carried out, veterinary surgeon preference and previous experience would be the relevant factors in choosing which operation to perform.</p><br /> <img src="https://www.veterinaryevidence.org/rcvskmod/icons/oa-icon.jpg" alt="Open Access" /> <img src="https://www.veterinaryevidence.org/rcvskmod/icons/pr-icon.jpg" alt="Peer Reviewed" />

Highlights

  • A Knowledge Summary by Jim Connah BVSc MANZCVS1In dogs undergoing surgery for repair of a prolapsed gland of the third eyelid (cherry eye), is a pocket technique superior to an anchoring technique in preventing recurrence?

  • 1/17 prolapses recurred with the pocket technique

  • Whilst cohort studies generally appear higher in the hierarchy of evidence based veterinary medicine, the two included in this Knowledge Summary (Lin & Lin, (2003); Gupta et al, (2016)) suffered from having no control groups

Read more

Summary

A Knowledge Summary by Jim Connah BVSc MANZCVS1

In dogs undergoing surgery for repair of a prolapsed gland of the third eyelid (cherry eye), is a pocket technique superior to an anchoring technique in preventing recurrence?. For surgical treatment of a prolapsed gland of the third eyelid (cherry eye), there is currently no evidence to suggest that either an anchoring technique or a pocket technique is significantly better than the other when comparing recurrence rates. Whilst all the cited studies compared techniques, and reported excellent outcomes for both, only one (Multari et al, 2016) conducted any statistical analysis. This latter article did not show any significant difference in rates of recurrence. By comparing a pocket technique with a pocket plus anchor technique

Summary of the evidence
Limitations
Methodology Section
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.