Abstract

e-Learning acceptance has received considerable attention in the educational technology literature. In recent years, many frameworks have been proposed, modified, and applied to better understand the factors underlying students’ acceptance of e-learning. Despite the important progress made with the acceptance literature, extant empirical examinations have unfortunately often produced discordant findings. Researchers frequently advance situational factors as possible moderating influences on technology to explain the high degree of variance unexplained in specific technology acceptance situations. Generalized models have been proposed that attempt to integrate situational variables to account for the high degree of situational variability that occurs across technology acceptance contexts. Abdullah and Ward proposed such a general extended technology acceptance model in the context of e-learning (GETAMEL). In the current paper, our objective is to quantitatively evaluate the GETAMEL, and consider it with respect to a situative perspective on technology acceptance in order to more fully characterize the dynamical relationships and situational factors influencing determinants of e-learning acceptance. This study, drawing on a survey of 132 college students, validates the GETAMEL employing a partial least square path modeling approach.

Highlights

  • What factors affect acceptance of e-learning? A considerable body of work has investigated the salient antecedents to e-learning acceptance (Chen & Tseng, 2012; Cheung & Vogel, 2013; Dečman, 2015; Doleck, Bazelais, & Lemay, 2017a; Lee, 2010; Liu, Liao, & Pratt, 2009; Park, 2009; Šumak, Heričko, & Pušnik, 2011)

  • Procedure and participants In this cross-sectional study, students enrolled in pre-university science program at an English Collège d'enseignement général et professionnel (CEGEP) in Montreal were invited to participate in the study

  • While putting in question the stability of the GETAMEL, we find in these data support for the situative perspective, which posits that increased explanatory power requires models to be sensitive to the modulating effects of situational factors such as modality of beliefs (Doleck et al, 2017a, 2017b; Lemay et al, 2017) as contextual factors can systematically influence the way underlying beliefs influence technology acceptance beliefs, such that specific needs can trump other beliefs all else being equal

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A considerable body of work has investigated the salient antecedents to e-learning acceptance (Chen & Tseng, 2012; Cheung & Vogel, 2013; Dečman, 2015; Doleck, Bazelais, & Lemay, 2017a; Lee, 2010; Liu, Liao, & Pratt, 2009; Park, 2009; Šumak, Heričko, & Pušnik, 2011). E-learning has garnered substantial interest and represents an important development in both technology-enhanced and learner-directed learning. A better understanding of factors that either impede or promote students’ use of elearning can provide instructional technology designers better guidelines for e-learning design and development. To the extent that acceptance and continued use of e-learning matter, examining and understanding the underlying mechanism that drives learners’ elearning acceptance—that is, the factors that affect the adoption and use of e-learning— becomes salient

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call