Irrigation Management Effects on Crop Water Productivity for Maize Production in the Texas High Plains

Abstract

Corn (Zea mays L.) was grown under full and deficit irrigation in two research field locations near Bushland, TX, in 2018 to compare seasonal water use of two irrigation management approaches. Full irrigation was achieved in both fields by allowing no more than 55% depletion of plant available soil water. However, irrigation depth and frequency were different in each field. The USDA-ARS Conservation and Production Research Laboratory (CPRL) weighing lysimeter fields were generally irrigated twice weekly using irrigation depths ranging from 19 to 32 mm. The Texas A&M AgriLife Research Emeny field was irrigated only once per week, having greater application depths ranging from 35 to 42 mm. Deficit irrigation treatments of 75% of full irrigation were also performed in both research fields. Yield and crop water productivity values for the 100 and 75% lysimeter field irrigation treatments were greater than corresponding values for the Emeny field. Emeny field yields may have been slightly reduced by heat stress incurred between irrigations during early grain fill whereas more frequent irrigations on the lysimeter fields may have reduced heat stress during that period. Results from this study suggest that evaporative losses associated with the more frequent, smaller application depth irrigations on the lysimeter fields did not contribute to appreciably lower CWP values, as losses were likely mitigated by the rapid development of the corn canopy. These findings suggest that corn yield is principally dependent upon seasonal water inputs and losses from frequent, smaller depth irrigations are minimal outside of incomplete canopy conditions.