Abstract

Elbow lateral collateral ligament injuries (LCLI) are often managed with protected mobilization using a hinged elbow orthosis (HEO). The objective of this investigation was to determine the effectiveness of an HEO in stabilizing the elbow following LCLI. Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremity specimens were studied using a custom simulator that enabled elbow motion via computer-controlled actuators and servomotors attached to relevant tendons. Specimens were examined in 4 arm positions (dependent, overhead, horizontal, and varus) and 2 forearm positions (pronation and supination) during both passive and simulated active elbow extension. Specimens were examined before and after simulated LCLI, and then with the addition of an HEO. The lateral collateral ligament, common extensor origin, and lateral elbow capsule were sectioned in the injury model. An electromagnetic tracking system measured ulnohumeral kinematics. The orthosis did not change elbow stability in any arm position during active motion. Muscle activation and forearm pronation enhanced stability in the dependent, horizontal, and varus positions while the HEO was applied. This HEO does not improve the invitro stability of the elbow following simulated LCLI. An HEO may be safe to use during active motion, but when a patient is not activating the muscles normally (ie, owing to fatigue or cognitive impairment) and the arm is in positions in which the weight of the orthosis might increase joint distraction, an HEO maybe harmful. If an HEO is used, the forearm should be braced in pronation following LCLI.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call