Invisible and microscopic gold in pyrite: Methods and new data for massive sulfide ores of the Urals

Abstract

Au speciation in sulfides (including “invisible” Au), which mostly controls the loss of Au during ore dressing, is discussed. Modern methods of analysis of Au speciation, with discussion of limitations by locality and sensitivity, are reviewed. The results of sulfide investigation by the methods of scanning and transmission electron microscopy, mass spectrometric analysis with laser ablation (LA–ICP–MS), the thermochemical method (study of ionic Au speciation), and automated “quantitative mineralogy,” are demonstrated for weakly metamorphosed VHMS deposits of the Urals (Galkinsk and Uchaly). Significant content of Au is scattered in sulfides, such as pyrite, chalcopyrite, and sphalerite, with quantitative predomination of pyrite. The portion of such “invisible” gold ranges from <10% (Galkinsk deposit) to 85% (Uchaly deposit). Major part of “invisible” gold occurs as micron- to nanoscale particles of Au minerals. The portion of gold structurally bound in pyrite lattice (from the bulk concentration of Au in pyrite) is estimated to be from few % (the Galkinsk deposit) to 20–25% (the Uchaly deposit). The presence of As and Sb in pyrite and sphalerite, as well as other trace elements (Te, Co, Mn, Cu, Hg, and Ag in both as well as Fe in sphalerite) stimulates the incorporation of Au in sulfide, but mostly in defect-associated, not isomorphic form. Micron particles of Ag sulfosalts (pyrargyrite, freibergite, stephanite, polybasite, pyrostilpnite, argentotetrahedrite, pearceite, proustite), Au–Ag alloys (from gold of high fineness to kustelite), Ag and Au–Ag tellurides (hessite, empressite, calaverite), and occasional Au–Ag sulfides (petrovskaite, uytenbogaardtite) were registered in the areas of Au enrichment of both deposits; selenotelluride (kurilite) particles were found on the Galkinsk deposit. Nanoscale (1–50 nm) native gold (spherical and disk-shaped particles, flakes) with a monocrystal diffraction pattern of some particles and a ring diffraction pattern of other particles was registered in the ores of these deposits by the methods of transmission electron microscopy. The low degree (or absence) of metamorphic recrystallization results in (1) predomination of thin intergrowths of sulfides, which is the main reason for the bad concentration of ores (especially for the Galkinsk deposit) and (2) the high portion of “invisible” gold in the massive sulfide ores, which explains the low yield of Au in copper and zinc concentrates, since it is lost in tailings with predominating pyrite.