Abstract
The chapter discusses the limits that constitutional law in France imposes in relation to international investment treaties. It takes the decision by the French Conseil constitutionnel on the compatibility of the investor-State dispute settlement mechanisms contained in the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement concluded between Canada and the European Union with the French constitution as an example to illustrate one important aspect of the interplay between national constitutional law and international investment law, namely how constitutional courts control the constitutionality of investment treaties.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
