Abstract
An overwhelming majority of the economics profession is taught that there is an inverse relationship between interest rate and investment expenditures. In the light of the controversies in the theory of capital, we analyse in this article the way in which Marshall, Fisher and Keynes have constructed this inverse relationship. All three were aware of the problems associated with this construction and tried—albeit unsuccessfully—different ways to get around them. This implies that within the neoclassical analysis there does not exist a theoretically consistent conceptualisation of an investment demand function inversely responsive to the rate of interest.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
