Abstract
Careful observers had already pointed out before the capital theory controversies that an investment demand schedule inversely responsive to the rate of interest is theoretically untenable. This implies that the weak empirical evidence showing the negative relation between aggregate investment spending and the rate of interest cannot be explained via the neoclassical investment theory. Assuming a short-run framework and concentrating on the “Sources and Uses of Funds Account,” it is shown here that the inverse relationship between the two variables derives, not from the investment demand function, but from the ability to finance investment spending. The explanation is valid only in the short run. In the long run, aggregate investment spending may rise, fall, or remain constant in response to a change in the rate of interest. JEL Classification: B51, E11, E22, G31
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
