Abstract

Subjective Chinese speech intelligibility was evaluated by using three sources with different directional patterns: an omnidirectional source, a source with similar directivity of a human speaker, and a human speaker source in both real and virtual rectangular rooms with different reverberation times. The result shows that subjective Chinese speech intelligibility scores exhibit statistical differences under different source conditions. Speech intelligibility scores obtained by using an omnidirectional source are lower than those obtained by using the other two sources. Therefore, the use of omnidirectional sources will undermine speech intelligibility compared with real human speech in rooms. Subjective Chinese speech intelligibility obtained from virtual rooms using auralization is basically similar to that obtained in real rooms under different source directivity conditions. Using the auralization technique enables the proper evaluation of subjective Chinese speech intelligibility with different directional sources.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.