Abstract

Near surface quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) from weather radar measurements is an important task for feeding hydrological models, limiting the impact of severe rain events at the ground as well as aiding validation studies of satellite-based rain products. To date, several works have analyzed the performance of various QPE algorithms using actual and synthetic experiments, possibly trained by measurement of particle size distributions and electromagnetic models. Most of these studies support the use of dual polarization radar variables not only to ensure a good level of data quality but also as a direct input to rain estimation equations. One of the most important limiting factors in radar QPE accuracy is the vertical variability of particle size distribution, which affects all the acquired radar variables as well as estimated rain rates at different levels. This is particularly impactful in mountainous areas, where the sampled altitudes are likely several hundred meters above the surface. In this work, we analyze the impact of the vertical profile variations of rain precipitation on several dual polarization radar QPE algorithms when they are tested in a complex orography scenario. So far, in weather radar studies, more emphasis has been given to the extrapolation strategies that use the signature of the vertical profiles in terms of radar co-polar reflectivity. This may limit the use of the radar vertical profiles when dual polarization QPE algorithms are considered. In that case, all the radar variables used in the rain estimation process should be consistently extrapolated at the surface to try and maintain the correlations among them. To avoid facing such a complexity, especially with a view to operational implementation, we propose looking at the features of the vertical profile of rain (VPR), i.e., after performing the rain estimation. This procedure allows characterization of a single variable (i.e., rain) when dealing with vertical extrapolations. In this work, a definition of complex orography is also given, introducing a radar orography index to objectively quantify the degree of terrain complexity when dealing with radar QPE in heterogeneous environmental scenarios. Three case studies observed by the research C-band polarization agility Doppler radar named Polar 55C, managed by the Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (ISAC) at the National Research Council of Italy (CNR), were used to prove the concept of VPR. Our results indicate that the combined algorithm, which merges together differential phase shift (Kdp), single polarization reflectivity factor (Zhh), and differential reflectivity (Zdr), once accurately processed, in most cases performs better among those tested and those that make use of Zhh alone, Kdp alone, and Zhh, and Zdr. Improvements greater than 25% are found for the total rain accumulations in terms of normalized bias when the VPR extrapolation is applied.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThere has been increasing attention paid to developing new applications and planning missions to monitor and deliver quantitative information of near surface rain precipitation.The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission [1] is a recent valuable example of measuring precipitation using spaceborne active and passive sensors.From the ground, measuring systems of rainfall are essential for providing a reference measure for the validation of the satellite rain products over land [2] as well as to prevent flood hazards (e.g., by using nowcasting algorithms [3] or assimilation into forecast models [4]), aiding civil protection actions

  • In recent years, there has been increasing attention paid to developing new applications and planning missions to monitor and deliver quantitative information of near surface rain precipitation.The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission [1] is a recent valuable example of measuring precipitation using spaceborne active and passive sensors.From the ground, measuring systems of rainfall are essential for providing a reference measure for the validation of the satellite rain products over land [2] as well as to prevent flood hazards, aiding civil protection actions

  • Weather radars can be affected by several error sources, including radar miscalibration [10], clutter contamination [11], wet radome attenuation [12], rain-induced attenuation [13], non-uniform beam filling [14], radiofrequency interferences [15], and uncertainties related to the vertical variability of the particle size distribution (PSD) [16,17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been increasing attention paid to developing new applications and planning missions to monitor and deliver quantitative information of near surface rain precipitation.The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission [1] is a recent valuable example of measuring precipitation using spaceborne active and passive sensors.From the ground, measuring systems of rainfall are essential for providing a reference measure for the validation of the satellite rain products over land [2] as well as to prevent flood hazards (e.g., by using nowcasting algorithms [3] or assimilation into forecast models [4]), aiding civil protection actions. Quantitative measurements of rain precipitation at the Earth’s surface using ground-based systems are typically affected by a number of limiting factors due to errors introduced both by the observation instruments used as well as the variability of rainfall in time and space compared to the sampling interval of the acquired measurements. The vertical variability of PSD directly impacts the variability of the measured radar quantities; for example, the reflectivity factor (Zhh ), the differential reflectivity (Zdr ), and the specific differential phase shift (Kdp ) as well as the estimates of near-surface rain rate (R), which is usually obtained from the radar quantities measured aloft. As far as the authors have been able to ascertain, none of the works referenced above have addressed the issue of vertical extrapolation when dealing with weather radar dual polarization rain estimation formulas, there is growing interest in the characterization of the signature of the vertical profile of Kdp and Zdr [24]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.