Abstract

Since the stability of slopes in infrastructures such as road and railroad embankments, excavations, and, in general, earthwork is important, analyzing the stability of these slopes has been one of the main focuses of geotechnical engineers. Although analyzing both reinforced and unreinforced slopes is needed, reinforced slopes require special attention as the reinforcement elements significantly affect the calculations. Hence, the current study’s aim is to find out the differences between obtained safety factors using the Limit Equilibrium Method (LEM) and Shear Strength Reduction Method (SSRM). For this purpose, first, the origin differences in terms of Safety Factor (SF) are theoretically determined according to basic formulas for the aforementioned techniques. Then, to verify the formula, several numerical modelings are carried out using in situ measured geotechnical data to better understand the differences in terms of safety factors. The results indicate that for the reinforced slope with an SF value of higher than 1, the SSRM provides a higher SF in comparison with the other techniques, and the origin of this difference is the definitions of the SF in the different methods.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call