Abstract

Due to a rising annual incidence of bladder cancer, there is a growing need for development of new strategies for treatment. In 2018, the World Cancer Research Fund and other groups reported that there were ~550,000 new cases worldwide of bladder cancer. It has been further estimated that >200,000 individuals die annually from bladder cancer worldwide. Various treatment options exist. However, many if not all remain suboptimal. While the preferred chemotherapeutic options have changed in the past few years there have been few advances in the bladder cancer medical device field. Cryoablation is now being evaluated as a new option for the treatment of bladder cancer. While several studies have shown cryoablation to be promising for the treatment of bladder cancer, a lack of basic information pertaining to dosing (minimal lethal temperature) necessary to destroy bladder cancer has limited its use as a primary therapeutic option. Concerns with bladder wall perforation and other side effects have also slowed adoption.In an effort to detail the effects of freezing on bladder cancer, two human bladder cancer cell lines, SCaBER and UMUC3, were evaluated in vitro. SCaBER, a basal subtype of muscle invasive bladder cancer, and UMUC3, an intermediate transitional cell carcinoma, are both difficult to treat but are reportedly responsive to most conventional treatments. SCaBER and UMUC3 cells were exposed to a range of freezing temperatures from −10 to −25°C and compared to non-frozen controls. The data show that a single 5 minute freeze to −10°C did not affect cell viability, whereas −15°C and −20°C results in a significant reduction in viability 1 day post freeze to <20%. These populations, however, were able to recover in culture. A complete loss of cell viability was found following a single freeze at −25°C. Application of a repeat (double) freeze resulted in complete cell death at −20°C. In addition to freezing alone, studies investigating the impact of adjunctive low dose (1 μM) cisplatin pre-treatment (30 minutes and 24 hours) in combination with freezing were conducted. The combination of 30 minute cisplatin pre-treatment and mild (−15°C) freezing resulted in complete cell death. This suggests that subclinical doses of cisplatin may be synergistically effective when combined with freezing.In summary, these in vitro results suggest that freezing to temperatures in the range of −20 to 25°C results in a high degree of bladder cancer cell destruction. Further, the data describe a potential combinatorial chemo/cryo therapeutic strategy for the treatment of bladder cancer.

Highlights

  • There is an indisputable need for the development of new strategies and medical devices for treating both local and metastatic bladder cancer

  • This study investigated the survival response of two bladder cancer cell lines following a freezing insult in an effort to identify the minimal lethal temperature necessary for complete cell destruction as well as the impact of double freeze exposure

  • Investigation into the impact of low-dose cisplatin pre-treatment in combination with mild freezing (-15°C) were conducted as a number of studies have detailed the benefit of adjunctive drug/freezing in enhancing cancer kill under conditions which when applied as a monotherapy are non-lethal [16,22,23,24,25,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is an indisputable need for the development of new strategies and medical devices for treating both local and metastatic bladder cancer. About half of newly diagnosed cases are noninvasive cancers contained within the inner layer of the bladder wall. About 33% of cases are more locally advanced with muscle invasion having spread into deeper layers of the bladder upon diagnosis, and the remaining cases represent metastatic bladder cancers [7]. According to the American Cancer Society the survival rate for bladder cancer varies based on the SEER stage: Localized (69%); in situ alone (95%); Regional (35%); Distant (5%); and 77% for all SEER stages combined [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.