Abstract

BackgroundElectrosurgery units are widely employed in modern surgery. Advances in technology have enhanced the safety of these devices, nevertheless, accidental burns are still regularly reported. This study focuses on possible causes of sacral burns as complication of the use of electrosurgery. Burns are caused by local densifications of the current, but the actual pathway of current within patient’s body is unknown. Numerical electromagnetic analysis can help in understanding the issue.MethodsTo this aim, an accurate heterogeneous model of human body (including seventy-seven different tissues), electrosurgery electrodes, operating table and mattress was build to resemble a typical surgery condition. The patient lays supine on the mattress with the active electrode placed onto the thorax and the return electrode on his back. Common operating frequencies of electrosurgery units were considered. Finite Difference Time Domain electromagnetic analysis was carried out to compute the spatial distribution of current density within the patient’s body. A differential analysis by changing the electrical properties of the operating table from a conductor to an insulator was also performed.ResultsResults revealed that distributed capacitive coupling between patient body and the conductive operating table offers an alternative path to the electrosurgery current. The patient’s anatomy, the positioning and the different electromagnetic properties of tissues promote a densification of the current at the head and sacral region. In particular, high values of current density were located behind the sacral bone and beneath the skin. This did not occur in the case of non-conductive operating table.ConclusionResults of the simulation highlight the role played from capacitive couplings between the return electrode and the conductive operating table. The concentration of current density may result in an undesired rise in temperature, originating burns in body region far from the electrodes. This outcome is concordant with the type of surgery-related sacral burns reported in literature. Such burns cannot be immediately detected after surgery, but appear later and can be confused with bedsores. In addition, the dosimetric analysis suggests that reducing the capacity coupling between the return electrode and the operating table can decrease or avoid this problem.

Highlights

  • Electrosurgery units are widely employed in modern surgery

  • Pure sinusoidal waveforms are usually adopted by Electrosurgery unit (ESU) for the cut-mode, but to obtain coagulation or blend modalities, the sinusoid is usually modulated in amplitude

  • An exact calculation requires the knowledge of the precise waveforms delivered by the ESU devices, which may change depending on the manufacturer and the model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electrosurgery units are widely employed in modern surgery. Advances in technology have enhanced the safety of these devices, accidental burns are still regularly reported. Burns are caused by local densifications of the current, but the actual pathway of current within patient’s body is unknown. Electrosurgery unit (ESU) operation assumes that current densities within patient’s body are high only at the point of contact with the active electrode and are much lower in other tissues, in order to produce heating effect only at that contact point [1]. The modern ESU is a floating applied part (usually type BF [2]) with no direct path to ground. This reduces hazards inherent in grounded systems such as current division and alternate site burns [3,4,5,6]. Risks of unintentional tissue damage, including burns (known as alternate site burns), exist and possible causes must be investigated and prevented

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call