Abstract

The emergence of the spectral variation hypothesis (SVH) has gained widespread attention in the remote sensing community as a method for deriving biodiversity information from remotely sensed data. SVH states that spectral heterogeneity on remotely sensed imagery reflects environmental heterogeneity, which in turn is associated with high species diversity and, therefore, could be useful for characterizing landscape biodiversity. However, the effect of phenology has received relatively less attention despite being an important variable influencing plant species spectral responses. The study investigated (i) the effect of phenology on the relationship between spectral heterogeneity and plant species diversity and (ii) explored spectral angle mapper (SAM), the coefficient of variation (CV) and their interaction effect in estimating species diversity. Stratified random sampling was adopted to survey all tree species with a diameter at breast height of > 10 cm in 90 × 90 m plots distributed throughout the study site. Tree species diversity was quantified by the Shannon diversity index (H′), Simpson index of diversity (D2) and species richness (S). SAM and CV were employed on Landsat-8 data to compute spectral heterogeneity. The study applied linear regression models to investigate the relationship between spectral heterogeneity metrics and species diversity indices across four phenological stages. The results showed that the end of the growing season was the most ideal phenological stage for estimating species diversity, following the SVH concept. During this period, SAM and species diversity indices (S, H′, D2) had an r2 of 0.14, 0.24, and 0.20, respectively, while CV had an r2 of 0.22, 0.22, and 0.25, respectively. The interaction of SAM and CV improved the relationship between the spectral data and H′ and D2 (from r2 of 0.24 and 0.25 to r2 of 0.32 and 0.28, respectively) at the end of the growing season. The two spectral heterogeneity metrics showed differential sensitivity to components of plant diversity. SAM had a high relationship with H′ followed by D2 and then a lower relationship with S throughout the different phenological stages. Meanwhile, CV had a higher relationship with D2 than other plant diversity indices and its relationship with S and H′ remained similar. Although the coefficient of determination was comparatively low, the relationship between spectral heterogeneity metrics and species diversity indices was statistically significant (p < 0.05) and this supports the assertion that SVH could be implemented to characterize plant species diversity. Importantly, the application of SVH should consider (i) the choice of spectral heterogeneity metric in line with the purpose of the SVH application since these metrics relate to components of species diversity differently and (ii) vegetation phenology, which affects the relationship that spectral heterogeneity has with plant species diversity.

Highlights

  • Remote sensing application in biodiversity research has long been a topical subject.The subject focused mostly on the utility of remotely sensed data for identifying biodiversity hotspots, assessing species richness and distributions and modeling biodiversity responses to changing environmental conditions [1] (Turner et al, 2003)

  • The study concludes that vegetation phenology affects the relationship between spectral heterogeneity and plant species diversity

  • The end of the growing season was the optimal phenological stage where the relationships between spectral heterogeneity metrics and species diversity indices were high, and it declined steadily with changes in phenology toward senescence. This observation gives an indication that spectral variation hypothesis (SVH) might be time dependent and vegetation phenology ought to be considered in the application of SVH for biodiversity estimation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Remote sensing application in biodiversity research has long been a topical subject.The subject focused mostly on the utility of remotely sensed data for identifying biodiversity hotspots, assessing species richness and distributions and modeling biodiversity responses to changing environmental conditions [1] (Turner et al, 2003). Remote sensing satellites have two advantages over traditional field surveys: (i) the repeated collection allows for regular assessments of temporal changes in biodiversity and (ii) the availability of data in different spatial resolutions facilitates the multi-scale assessment of biodiversity [3,4]. These features of satellite remote sensing make it an attractive source of data for biodiversity studies

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.