Abstract

Direct displacement-based design (DDBD) approach attempts to alleviate the shortcomings of force-based design (FBD) approach to achieve seismic resistance of structures. Many simplified procedures for DDBD proposed in the literature are conceptually similar, yet differ in their considerations for crucial parameters such as target displacement profile, equivalent viscous damping equation and base shear distribution pattern in the design process. Due to variation in the aforementioned parameters, seismic force, their distribution and element design differs, leading to significant changes in the inelastic behavior of the building. The present numerical study compares the performance of low, medium and high-rise RC frame buildings designed using six DDBD approaches for two drift levels. The seismic performance of the considered buildings has been deliberated by both nonlinear static pushover as well as nonlinear dynamic time-history methods. From analysis results, it is observed that the 84th percentile of the sample mean storey displacement of low-rise buildings designed for low storey drift exceeds the target profile, whereas, this behavior is contrary in high-rise buildings designed for higher storey drift. The analysis also highlighted that the parabolic displacement profile consideration for mid and high-rise buildings is rational than the linear displacement profile consideration. In the present case, it seems that equivalent viscous damping estimation and displacement spectra modification factors are conservative for all the DDBD approaches and needs modification to improve its rationality.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call