Abstract
Abstract Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interaction represents the largest uncertainty in climate change’s current and future understanding. Therefore, aerosol properties affecting the cloud and precipitation formation and their accurate estimation is a first step in developing improved parameterizations for the prognostic climate models. Over the last couple of decades, a commercially available Cloud Condensation Nuclei Counter (CCNC) has been deployed in the field and laboratory for characterizing CCN properties of ambient or atmospherically relevant laboratory-generated aerosols. However, most of the CCN measurements performed in the field are often compounded with the erroneous estimation of CCN concentration and other parameters due to a lack of robust and accurate CCNC calibration. CCNC is not a plug-and-play instrument and requires prudent calibration and operation, to avoid erroneous data and added parameterization uncertainties. In this work, we propose and demonstrate the usability of a global calibration equation derived from CCNC calibration experiments from 8 contrasting global environments. Significant correlation was observed between the global calibration and each of the 16 individual experiments. A significant improvement in the correlation was observed when the calibration experiments were separated for high-altitude measurements. Using these equations, we further derived the effective hygroscopicity parameter and found lower relative uncertainty in the hygroscopicity parameter at higher effective supersaturation. Our results signify that altitude-based pressure change could be of importance for accurate calibration at high-altitude locations. Our results are consistent with previous studies emphasizing the criticality of the accurate CCN calibration for the lower supersaturations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have