Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to articulate how a Bourdieuian perspective contributed to the insights I gained about student teacher’s experiences of seminars. The rationale for the study relates to the limited nature of students involvement and participation in seminars I experienced in my teaching. However, I found little in the student literature that problematised students’ learning context, and in particular, the way students themselves experienced and perceived this particular learning context. I undertook three in-depth semi-structured interviews with 5 teacher education students at different points of their 2 nd year of study. The data highlighted the complexity and dynamic nature of this learning context. Relationships, pedagogical tools and artefacts appeared to play an important meditational role in what participants did and thought about their experiences during seminars. However, the data also suggested evidence of underlying discourses that seem to influence how the participants constructed their experiences of seminars. Good seminars seem to reflect the’ education as transmission’ and the’ good practice’ discourses that tend colour cultural meanings about teaching and learning. By using Bourdieu’s theory of practice, and in particular his theory of symbolic violence, I was able to gain a deeper insights into the meanings attached to seminar experiences, as well as new ways of thinking about my own values, practice and role as a tutor/lecturer in higher education.

Highlights

  • The view of seminars as a place for learning through interaction and dialogue is part of the tradition of higher education in the UK (Fry et al, 2009)

  • Findings from a Bourdieuian perspective Bourdieu's conceptual tools enabled a different way of interrogating the data

  • I was able to examine the extent to which participants’ constructions of seminars reflected the influence of dominant discourses such as ‘education as transmission’. This is a powerful discourse that emanates from educational perspectives that see teachers as infallible experts and learners as 'empty vessels' (Freire, 2000; Giroux, 2009), and can cut out alternative ways of conceptualising the student teacher relationship

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The view of seminars as a place for learning through interaction and dialogue is part of the tradition of higher education in the UK (Fry et al, 2009). (2012) Investigating student teachers' perspectives of learning and participating in seminars. Seminars can be defined as classes where a group of students and a tutor discuss a particular topic (Oxford Dictionary, 1989). There are variations in terms of how individual tutors, courses and universities interpret the purposes and practice of seminars. In some cases, they are the main teaching and learning contexts where students are actively involved in leading seminars. They are the main teaching and learning contexts where students are actively involved in leading seminars In others, they are mainly tutor-led and involve group activities and/or are discussion based (Gunn, 2007)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call