Abstract

Accurate estimation of above-ground biomass (AGB) in forested areas is essential for studying forest ecological functions, surface carbon cycling, and global carbon balance. Over the past decade, models that harness the distinct features of multi-source remote sensing observations for estimating AGB have gained significant popularity. It is worth exploring the differences in model performance by using simple and fused data. Additionally, quantitative estimation of the impact of high-cost laser point clouds on satellite imagery of varying costs remains largely unexplored. To address these challenges, model performance and cost must be considered comprehensively. We propose a comprehensive assessment based on three perspectives (i.e., performance, potential and limitations) for four typical AGB-estimation models. First, different variables are extracted from the multi-source and multi-resolution data. Subsequently, the performance of four regression methods is tested for AGB estimation with diverse indicator combinations. Experimental results prove that the combination of multi-source data provides a highly accurate AGB regression model. The proposed regression and variables rating approaches can flexibly integrate other data sources for modeling. Furthermore, the data cost is discussed against the AGB model performance. Our study demonstrates the potential of using low-cost satellite data to provide a rough AGB estimation for larger areas, which can allow different remote sensing data to meet different needs of forest management decisions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call