Inverted papilloma of urinary bladder: Is long-term cystoscopic surveillance needed? A single center’s experience

Abstract

Objectives To review all cases of urinary bladder inverted papilloma (IP) in our institution and determine the need for cystoscopic surveillance. IP is an uncommon benign tumor of the urinary tract. Its multiplicity, recurrence, and association with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) suggest possible malignant potential, leading to conflicting clinical conclusions regarding the need for surveillance. Methods All consecutive patients from January 1991 to December 2004 with IP were included in this study. A single pathologist performed the histologic review. The patients had undergone cystoscopy and ultrasound evaluation of the kidneys every 6 months. Results Of the 52 patients, 45 were men and 7 were women. The average age at presentation was 58.9 ± 11.8 years (range 30 to 79). No patient had a synchronous or previous bladder tumor. The most common complaint was macroscopic hematuria. Ten cases were incidental findings during bladder ultrasonography or cystoscopy. All were solitary tumors, most commonly found at the bladder neck. The average follow-up period was 62 ± 23 months, with no recurrence. One case of subsequent noninvasive papillary TCC developed 15 months later. The initial histologic findings had revealed cytologic atypia, with suspicious urine cytology findings. On review, it was more compatible with TCC with an inverted pattern. Conclusions Although our cases exhibited benign biologic behavior, the presence of cytologic atypia and suspicious urine cytology require exclusion of TCC with an inverted pattern. Thus, in histologically proven solitary bladder IP with no associated TCC, cystoscopic surveillance may not be necessary.