Abstract

Forest stock volume (FSV) is a basic data source for estimating forest carbon sink. It is also a crucial parameter that reflects the quality of forest resources and forest management level. The use of remote sensing data combined with a support vector regression (SVR) algorithm has been widely used in FSV estimation. However, due to the complexity and spatial heterogeneity of the forest biological community, in the FSV high-value area with dense vegetation, the optical re-mote sensing variables tend to be saturated, and the sensitivity of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) backscattering features to the FSV is significantly reduced. These factors seriously affect the ac-curacy of the FSV estimation. In this study, Landsat 8 (L8) Operational Land Imager multispectral images and C-band Sentinel-1 (S1) hyper-temporal SAR images were used to extract three re-mote sensing feature datasets: spectral variables (L8), backscattering coefficients (S1), and inter-ferometric SAR factors (S1-InSAR). We proposed a feature selection method based on SVR (FS-SVR) and compared the FSV estimation performance of FS-SVR and stepwise regression analysis (SRA) on the aforementioned three remote sensing feature datasets. Finally, an estima-tion model of coniferous FSV was constructed using the SVR algorithm in Wangyedian Forest Farm, Inner Mongolia, China, and the spatial distribution map of coniferous FSV was predicted. The experimental results show the following: (1) The coherence amplitude and DSM data ob-tained based on S1 images contain information relat-ed to forest canopy height, and the hy-per-temporal S1 image data significantly enrich the diversity of S1-InSAR feature factors. There-fore, the S1-InSAR dataset has a better FSV response than remote sensing factors such as the S1 backscattering coefficient and L8 vegetation index, and the corresponding root mean square er-ror (RMSE) and relative RMSE (rRMSE) values reached 47.6 m3/ha and 20.9%, respectively. (2) The integrated dataset can provide full play to the synergy of the L8, S1, and S1-InSAR remote sensing data. Its RMSE and rRMSE values are 44.3 m3/ha and 19.4% respectively. (3) The proposed FS-SVR method can better select remote sensing variables suitable for FSV estimation than SRA. The average value of the rRMSE (23.17%) based on the three datasets was 13.8% lower than that of the SRA method (26.87%). This study provides new insights into forest FSV retrieval based on active and passive multisource remote sensing joint data.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call