Abstract

Sparse imaging relies on sparse representations of the target scenes to be imaged. Predefined dictionaries have long been used to transform radar target scenes into sparse domains, but the performance is limited by the artificially designed or existing transforms, e.g., Fourier transform and wavelet transform, which are not optimal for the target scenes to be sparsified. The dictionary learning (DL) technique has been exploited to obtain sparse transforms optimized jointly with the radar imaging problem. Nevertheless, the DL technique is usually implemented in a manner of patch processing, which ignores the relationship between patches, leading to the omission of some feature information during the learning of the sparse transforms. To capture the feature information of the target scenes more accurately, we adopt image patch group (IPG) instead of patch in DL. The IPG is constructed by the patches with similar structures. DL is performed with respect to each IPG, which is termed as group dictionary learning (GDL). The group oriented sparse representation (GOSR) and target image reconstruction are then jointly optimized by solving a l1 norm minimization problem exploiting GOSR, during which a generalized Gaussian distribution hypothesis of radar image reconstruction error is introduced to make the imaging problem tractable. The imaging results using the real ISAR data show that the GDL-based imaging method outperforms the original DL-based imaging method in both imaging quality and computational speed.

Highlights

  • Inverse synthetic aperture radar (ISAR) can obtain high resolution images of moving targets in all weather, day and night

  • A singular value decomposition (SVD) based DL method is performed with respect to each image patch group (IPG), which is termed as group dictionary learning (GDL)

  • We use real plane data and ship data sets to demonstrate the performance of the proposed GDL based ISAR imaging method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inverse synthetic aperture radar (ISAR) can obtain high resolution images of moving targets in all weather, day and night. The strategy of processing each target scene patch independently during the DL and sparse coding stages neglects the important feature information between the patches, such as the self-similarity information which has been proved to be very efficient for preserving image details [16,17,18,19,20] during the image formation process. Both DL and sparse coding stages are calculated with relatively expensive nonlinear estimations, e.g., orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP).

Model of ISAR Measurements
Sparse Imaging Model
DL-Based Sparse Imaging
Off-Line DL Based Sparse Imaging
On-Line DL-Based Sparse Imaging
GDL-Based Sparse Imaging
Construction of Image Patch Group
ISAR Image Patch Group Based Imaging Model
Group Dictionary Learning Based Sparse Imaging
Group Dictionary Learning
Group Sparse Representation and Target Image Reconstruction
Experimental Results
Imaging Data and Parameters
Image Quality Evaluation
Imaging Results of Real Data
Quantitative Evaluation of Image Quality
Methods
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call